How to Know How Much Life Insurance You Need

An important part of responsible financial planning is to protect yourself against risk events that can be financially devastating. One such event is a premature death. When trying to understand how much life insurance you should own, you should take into consideration two things: 1) What lump-sum expenses you might want paid for, for example a mortgage, college tuition costs, other debts, and funeral expenses, and 2) Any income that you and/or a survivor might want replaced, such as a prior salary. Generally you don’t want this salary to be replaced indefinitely, but rather a common practice is to replace it until the survivor reaches retirement age. This calculation is a bit too complex to work out here, but the proper way to calculate this income need is to ensure that it inflates each year and will keep pace with inflation.

One very crude way to get a ballpark estimate of how much life insurance it would take to create an income stream is simply to capitalize an income need. For example, if you think that you need $2,000 a month in replaced income ($24k a year), then simply divide $24,000 by an interest rate at which you think you could invest the funds to spin off $2,000 a month in income. So, $24,000 divided by 8% results in a capital need of $300k. To put this differently, if you invested $300,000 at 8%, it could generate $2,000 a month in income. Again, this is very crude and inaccurate, and it shouldn’t be used for anything more than rough estimates (it’s inaccurate because it doesn’t take into account taxes and fees, nor does it cease to create an income stream at retirement, and thus it can over-inflate the need, and it also doesn’t adjust for inflation).

Finally, one needs to subtract from the income need and the lump-sum need any other sources of income or capital, for example rental income (if the survivor will continue to be a landlord), or other sources of life-insurance or assets that could be earmarked for a survivor’s needs.

If you would like assistance with calculating how much life insurance you need, or if you would like a professional overview of your existing policies, feel free to reach out to us here.

First Posted over here: How to Know How Much Life Insurance You Need

Why It’s So Hard to Spend Down Your 401(k) in Retirement

Will I underspend my assets? Will I run out of money? These are questions that retirees face every day as they decide how much to withdraw from their retirement plans. In a recent MarketWatch article, Alicia Munnell expresses concern about the millions of Americans who will be entirely reliant on their 401(k) assets at retirement:

At a recent conference, retirement experts concluded that the lack of an easy drawdown mechanism in 401(k) plans was the major challenge facing the 401(k) system.

 

In 2014, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued guidance that made longevity annuities accessible to 401(k) plans and that enabled target date funds to include annuity contracts either as a default or as a regular investment option. But individual plan sponsors feel under siege by lawsuits and see little payoff to being innovative. At the same time, Congress is unlikely to mandate that annuities be a part of 401(k) arrangements.

 

So we are at a standstill. Millions of Americans — having been told that their retirement plans are automatic — will be handed a pile of money and told they are on their own. Neither academics nor policymakers really have any idea how they will behave. Recent studies show that people draw down their balances in retirement much more slowly than expected. But most of today’s retirees with a retirement plan have an old-fashioned defined benefit plan, so these studies have little to say about the likely behavior of those retiring entirely dependent on 401(k) plans.

Munnell is onto something here. Working with retirees every day, our firm has concluded that a major risk to retirees is their lack of of a retirement drawdown strategy. In other words, they need a coherent strategy that will help them turn their life’s savings into a regular pay check that will last as long as they do. Given that there are at least ten strategies for accomplishing this task, selecting and implementing a retirement drawdown strategy is easier said than done. Munnell cites a Boston College study that leads her to favor the RMD method, but this is only one strategy out of many and, depending on one’s unique set of circumstances, it may not be the most effective.

Nevertheless, Munnell is spot on when she points out the many hurdles one must overcome when deciding how best to spend down retirement savings:

First, people seem to have a psychological attachment to their pile; they have spent a lifetime building it up and may be reluctant to draw it down. Second, people are fearful about end-of-life health care needs and want to be sure they have enough money to cover their expenses. Finally, people seem to have a desire to leave a bequest — perhaps ensuring their immortality. So, without some guidance, chances are high that retirees will deprive themselves of necessities.

In light of these retirement complexities, the best course of action one can take is to educate one’s self on the many drawdown options that are available. It’s also a good idea to develop a retirement income strategy in the context of one’s larger financial circumstances. This is important because a strategy that’s right for one person may not be right for someone else. Working with a comprehensive financial planner who is a fee-only fiduciary can also be a good way to obtain a more comprehensive strategy that can help one avoid potential blind spots.

At Dunston Financial Group, we regularly assist both retirees and pre-retirees with their retirement income strategies, and we’re always happy to be a resource for retirees who are attempting to navigate this important and complex topic. If you would like assistance, you can reach us here.

First Seen over here: Why It’s So Hard to Spend Down Your 401(k) in Retirement

Should You Invest in Digital Currency?

I recently spoke with someone who told me that he removed all of his cash from the bank and 401(k) and invested it in digital currency. Indeed, some are finding that investing in digital currencies such as Bitcoin and ether can earn a high rate of return. But before you join the stampede into the world of digital currency investing, consider this recent news excerpt from Seeking Alpha:

Cryptocurrencies took a beating this past weekend. Bitcoin traded as low as $1,836, down about 8% on the day, and almost 40% from its high of $3,018 on June 11, while ether plunged almost 20% to $155, knocking off about 60% from its high of $395 on June 13. The selloffs are yet another stark reminder that digital assets remain highly speculative trading vehicles.

Moreover, the co-founder of ethereum network recently told Bloomberg News that the digital currency ether is “a ticking time-bomb.” “There’s an over-tokenization of things as companies are issuing tokens when the same tasks can be achieved with existing blockchains. People are blinded by fast and easy money.”

Ah, yes. “Fast and easy money.” Digital currency investing may be the sexiest investment that’s come along in a while, but the allure of fast and easy money has been around for millennia, and there’s no shortage of people who have been devastated in their pursuit of riches.

Of course we’ve seen this before. One might recall the late ’90s when high-tech mutual funds were creating nothing short of a feeding frenzy on Wall Street. But one also shouldn’t forget the countless people who lost everything after they made huge bets in technology only to watch many of their investments go bankrupt.

The temptation to make big money will never go away. But the lessons from history and successful investors of the past are tried and true, and they should not be forgotten. Before investing in digital currency, or any other investment, consider the following:

  1. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
  2. For every person who makes it big, there are usually many more who took significant losses.
  3. Any investment that falls into the category of “highly speculative” should not be earmarked for any serious financial goal. If you’re saving for retirement, education, a wedding, a future home, or any other important goal, speculative investment vehicles are not the right place for your money. Speculative investments are for people who can afford to lose their entire investment.
  4. Diversification is key. Significant concentrations of money should not be made in any one investment or asset class.
  5. Slow and steady wins the race. Disciplined, long-term investing may not always be cool, but following a focused and strategic investment plan, usually centered around stocks, bonds, and real estate, will outlast the latest high-return investment and will give you a higher probability of success.

 

 

First Seen here: Should You Invest in Digital Currency?

Don’t Be Too Quick to Judge Medicaid: You Might Need It in Retirement

Long-term care planning is an important part of retirement planning and something we regularly talk to our clients about. One thing people often don’t realize, as Jordan Rau in this helpful NY Times article points out, is that Medicaid plays a vital role in long-term care planning and currently accounts for 42 percent of Medicaid expenditures. Some also don’t realize, as Rau continues, that many recipients “entered old age solidly middle class but turned to Medicaid, which was once thought of as a government program exclusively for the poor, after exhausting their insurance and assets.” Medicaid, then, isn’t a merely a system for the poor who need food assistance, but rather it’s an important social safety-net for retirees who can’t keep up with the pace of health care costs:

A combination of longer life spans and spiraling health care costs has left an estimated 64 percent of the Americans in nursing homes dependent on Medicaid. In Alaska, Mississippi and West Virginia, Medicaid was the primary payer for three-quarters or more of nursing home residents in 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

 

“People are simply outliving their relatives and their resources, and fortunately, Medicaid has been there,” said Mark Parkinson, the president of the American Health Care Association, a national nursing home industry group.

With all of the proposed changes taking place in congress, the full article in the NY Times is worth reading, and I think it provides a helpful perspective on the need for health care reform and the need for responsible, proactive retirement planning.

Article Source on: Don’t Be Too Quick to Judge Medicaid: You Might Need It in Retirement

Why You and Your Partner Might Not Want to Retire Together

Are you thinking of retiring at the same time as your spouse or partner? It might not be the best idea. Staggering retirement can take advantage of higher Social Security benefits, longer access to health insurance before Medicare becomes available, and larger retirement plan withdrawals. Investopedia author Mark P. Cussen and investment advisor Morris Armstrong explain in this helpful article that

“Unless couples are the same age, and in the same health, it usually makes more sense for one person to retire earlier. There can be both financial and relationship benefits,” says Morris Armstrong, registered investment advisor, Armstrong Financial Strategies, Cheshire, Conn. Financially speaking, the advantages are threefold. When one spouse works longer, the amount of Social Security benefits the couple is entitled to will increase. In addition, the continued income from the working spouse gives the couple a few more years to save for retirement. Finally, a spouse who works an extra three to five years will likely have a shorter period over which to draw on his or her retirement assets, allowing for larger withdrawal amounts each year.

And, given that retirement is a such a significant life transition for most people, Cussen explains that there are often emotional considerations that should be taken into account when couples are deciding whether or not to retire together:

Retirement in the modern era can be an emotionally complex proposition. Losing one’s sense of identity through work can be a major adjustment for some, while others are able to make this transition with relatively little difficulty. When a working couple retires, they suddenly find themselves at home together all the time, without the separation of work that they may have become accustomed to. This sudden shift can often disrupt a couple’s established relational boundaries. As such, it may be easier for couples if only one spouse goes through this process at a time, especially if either spouse expects to have difficulty adapting to the new lifestyle.

 

This gives at least one of the spouses (perhaps the one who is expected to have more difficulty with the process) some time alone to begin creating a new identity while some elements of their relationship, including separation during the day, remain stable. If both spouses retire at the same time, the emotional impact on each partner – and on their relationship as a couple – can create friction that might otherwise have been avoided. If both spouses struggle to find new paths for themselves, they may end up taking their frustrations out on each other.

If you’d like to talk more about your own retirement and whether a staggered retirement is right for you, feel free to get in touch with one of our retirement planning experts at Dunston Financial Group.

Original Post here: Why You and Your Partner Might Not Want to Retire Together

Why You May Not Want to Use an UGMA for Education Planning

We often come across clients who have UGMA or UTMA accounts set up for minor children. These are custodial trust accounts that are set up with a minor as beneficiary and parent or guardian as custodian under the Uniform Gifts/Transfers to Minors Act. These are often set up out of good will as a desire to make a gift to a child. When it comes to education planning, however, UGMA/UTMA accounts are often not the best vehicle for savings. This is because deposits to these accounts are considered irrevocable gifts to the minor, and the asset is considered an asset of the child’s for financial aid purposes. Such assets have a high impact on financial aid eligibility, whereas 529 plans, for example, do not. Transfers can be made from UGMA/UTMA accounts to 529s, but one has to title the account correctly when making the transfer.

If you’d like assistance with this and other education planning strategies, contact us today for a complimentary consultation.

First Seen right here: Why You May Not Want to Use an UGMA for Education Planning

Before You Pay for Financial Advice, Read This Guide via The NY Times

Earlier this year our firm was featured in The New York Times in an article about fees and the fiduciary rule. Our thoughts in that article were cited this week in another NY Times article about what consumers need to know before paying for financial advice. Generally I thought the piece was helpful and accurate. I will say that consumers need to be chary of hiring a robo-adviser, which is something the article points out as an option to investors. Investing is best done in the context of a financial plan, and a robo-adviser simply cannot give the kind of holistic and adaptable advice that is often necessary for financial success (e.g. When was the last time a robo-adviser monitored a portfolio with a keen eye so that an appropriate amount was converted to a Roth IRA?). Additionally, the article cites that one can get a financial plan in New York for $1,200. Perhaps this is true, but I hardly know a competent financial planner who would do a financial plan for $1,200. Financial planning fees often vary by complexity, and a better estimate would be a range beginning with $2,500 for less complex plans and $5,000 and up for more complex advice. Other than these minor points, I thought the article pointed consumers in the right direction, and I appreciated its focus on the need for sound fiduciary advice.

 

Article Source right here: Before You Pay for Financial Advice, Read This Guide via The NY Times

Quick Tip: Why You Shouldn’t Use a Roth IRA for Education Planning

When planning to fund a child’s education, there are many vehicles in which one can save for college expenses. These include, but are not limited to, Coverdell Educational Savings Accounts (ESAs), 529 plans, and UGMA/UTMAs. Sometimes one will even save in a Roth IRA. What many people don’t realize, however, is that the FAFSA financial aid form considers withdrawals from a Roth IRA to be untaxed income to the child. Consequently, such withdrawals can adversely affect a child’s ability to obtain financial aid. What is more, it’s generally best to keep retirement savings accounts earmarked for retirement and not to use them for other purposes.

Article Source here: Quick Tip: Why You Shouldn’t Use a Roth IRA for Education Planning